General Enquiries:office@whlaw.com.au
Perth:+61 8 9481 2040
Geraldton:+61 8 9921 2344
Employee versus contractor? Are you sure?
Over the past decade many Australian companies have retained the services of people who claim they are "contractors" not employees. Usually the "contractor" wants to be paid a gross fee/remuneration, stating that they will take care of income tax, superannuation and other payments.
The attraction for the employer is a lower total cost of retaining the person as compared to bringing them on as an employee, as well as perceived flexibility in options for ending the relationship as compared to traditional employment (the thinking is that no redundancy or leave entitlements need to be paid and no notice period applies).
Such practices were common in the IT, marketing, construction and other industries, particularly so called “digital industries”. The “gig economy” has seen the practice gain pace.
The legal reality is that many "contractors" are actually employees, particularly where they turn up to work at the same place each day, take their instructions from "a boss" at the company, are paid by the hour rather than for delivering an end product, and don't have to redo their work at their cost if the deliverable is not done to the required standard.
In such cases, income tax and compulsory superannuation guarantee payments must be paid by the employer for "contractors" who are, legally, employees. If the payments are not made, significant penalties accrue over time and must be paid to the Australian Tax Office (ATO).
Often this superannuation liability only hits home when the employer tries to sell their company and the buyer's due diligence experts point out the problem. Significant superannuation shortfall payments and ATO penalties loom large for the seller, as well as a reduction in the sale price, or at least a significant escrow sum demanded by the buyer.
A superannuation guarantee amnesty is potentially available.
Legislation has been reintroduced to Parliament providing an amnesty for employers who have not paid superannuation guarantee (SG) payments. The proposed amnesty will allow fines to be avoided, provided the SG payments are made.
The Treasury Laws Amendment (Recovering Unpaid Superannuation) Bill 2019 (the Bill) was re-introduced into the House of Representatives on 18 September 2019. The Bill was then referred to the Economics Legislation Committee for further inquiry. The Committee released its report recently - available here.
The Bill provides employers who have previously failed to pay SG contributions and failed to disclose the shortfall to the ATO with a “second chance” to self-correct any historical non-compliance.
This amnesty operates as a way for the ATO to encourage employers to disclose unpaid SG amounts for the period during which the amnesty applies - without fear that they will be liable for fines typically associated with non-compliance.
What are my SG obligations generally?
The Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (SGAA) requires that employers pay a certain percentage of an employee’s earning into the employee’s superannuation fund. A Superannuation Guarantee Charge (SGC) is imposed on employers who fail to pay the required SG amount i.e. the SGC is the shortfall plus interest and administration costs, and this is payable by the employer to the ATO each quarter.
Employers can also be liable for penalties for failing or refusing to provide a statement or information as required under the SGAA, which can be up to 200% of the amount of the underlying SG amount (known as Part 7 Penalties).
How will the proposed amnesty work?
The first step is disclosing unpaid SG to the ATO. An employer who discloses SG non-compliance and pays an employee’s full SG entitlements plus any interest (which may incude nominal interest and a general interest charge (GIC)) will be entitled to the amnesty, and will avoid liability for penalties normally associated with late payment and non-compliance.
The employer with an outstanding SG liability can either:
However, if employers have an existing SGC assessment for a quarter, or are otherwise unable to contribute directly into their employee’s superannuation fund, they will be required to pay the SGC to the Commissioner directly.
If the employer makes a disclosure under the amnesty, the administration charge component of the SGC will be waived (see example 1.1 in the Explanatory Memorandum).
The amnesty is proposed to extend to all reporting quarters from the quarter commencing 1 July 1992 to the quarter commencing 1 January 2018.
The disclosure to the ATO must be made in the correct form, and the employer must pay the amount of the disclosed SG to the employee or the SGC to the ATO (see above) within the required period. Failure to pay will mean the employer will not be able to rely on the amnesty and will be subject to the normal penalties imposed.
It is expected that employers will be given from 24 May 2018 to 6 months after the date the Bill receives Royal Assent to make disclosure and pay the shortfall and interest (the Amnesty Period).
In summary, in order to benefit from the amnesty the unpaid SGC must:
The employer must also:
If the employer does the above things for eligible SG shortfalls, they will not be liable for Part 7 Penalties. SG amounts paid during the Amnesty Period will be tax deductable.
If the Bill is passed, employers who have failed to comply with their SG obligations in the past should take advantage of this opportunity to avoid liability for such penalties.
Employers who fail to disclose during the Amnesty Period
Employers who do not disclose and pay unpaid SG and interest within the Amnesty Period will be subject to higher penalties. Generally, the Commissioner has discretion to remit Part 7 Penalties. However, from the day after the Amnesty Period ends the Commissioner’s ability to remit Part 7 Penalties will be limited. According to the Explanatory Memorandum, the Commissioner will not be able to remit penalties below 100% of the amount of SGC owing by the employer for a quarter covered by the amnesty. The penalty will include interest and an administration fee.
What does this mean for my business?
The amnesty is a one-off second chance for employers to reduce their exposure to penalites for unpaid SG. Employers who are aware that they have failed to comply with their SGC obligations, or are unsure whether they have fully complied since 1 July 1992, should ensure that they keep informed of the progress of the Bill.
In particular, employers who have utilised the services of “contractors” who look-and-feel like employees should consider taking advice on whether the persons involved were legally employees for the purposes of tax, superannuation and other legislation.
If you would like further information regarding the new laws or any other issue please contact Damian Quail or Cassandra Bailey.
This article is general information only, at the date it is posted. It is not, and should not be relied upon as, legal advice. This article might not be updated over time and therefore may not reflect changes to the law. Please feel free to contact us for legal advice that is specific to your situation.
It is not uncommon for businesses to advertise a headline price for goods and services to their customers, and to only disclose optional costs in the fine print or in a manner that is not necessarily clear to customers. This is no longer permitted. Some businessess will need to change their pricing practices, particularly businesses selling goods online.
The Treasury Laws Amendment (Australian Consumer Law Review) Bill 2018 amends the Australian Consumer Law contained within the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, and imposes an obligation on businesses operating in Australia to ensure transparent pricing for consumers. As of 26 October 2019, businesses must display the total price for the goods and services including all pre-selected optional items. In other words, if optional components are pre-selected or automatically applied by the seller, these options must be included in the headline price. The customer then has the option to remove the pre-selected options selected in order to pay a lower price.
These new laws will especially affect businesses who sell goods and services online. The Explanatory Memorandum to the new legislation provides some helpful examples in relation to airlines. For example, if an airline fare is $500 and a website pre-selects an optional carbon offset fee of $5, then the headline price must be $505, not $500. However, if the carbon offset fee is not pre-selected or automatically applied, then the ticket can be advertised at $500.
The same approach is applicable for promotions which display only a portion of the total price. Businesses must ensure that the total price is displayed just as clearly as the fractional price. Essentially, the new laws aim to avoid the situation where headline prices are advertised initially, but once the customer clicks through the website the price is increased to include pre-selected options and charges.
Businesses should ensure that their pricing strategies conform with the new laws.
If you would like further information regarding the new laws please contact Damian Quail.
This article is general information only, at the date it is posted. It is not, and should not be relied upon as, legal advice. This article might not be updated over time and therefore may not reflect changes to the law. Please feel free to contact us for legal advice that is specific to your situation.
LLB (Dist), BCom
Amy practices in general commercial and corporate law with a focus on property, business and share acquisitions and disposals.
Amy has a particular interest in property law and is routinely involved in all aspects of property transactions including legal due diligence, acquisitions and disposals, financing, leases, subdivisions, strata titles, transfer duty advice and conveyancing.
On the corporate side, Amy has acted on buy, sell and financier sides of company and business acquisitions and disposals.
Amy is based in our West Perth Office.
Amy’s recent experience includes:
We advise principals, developers, contractors, sub-contractors, project managers and consultants on all aspects of commercial construction contracts. We have extensive experience in preparing the full suite of documents relating to construction projects.
Our expertise includes:
We also advise in relation to construction disputes, including mediation, adjudication and arbitration. To see our experience click here.
Our notable experience includes:
Williams + Hughes has significant experience advising in relation to construction related disputes, payment claims and debt recovery. Click here for more details
Williams + Hughes advise public and private companies and individuals across a wide spectrum of industries. Our range of commercial litigation expertise and experience, coupled with ready access to senior legal personnel and our responsiveness, makes us top choice commercial litigation lawyers in Western Australia.
We recognise that clients often choose their legal advisors based on their knowledge and understanding of the client’s industry. Our lawyers work hard to understand the commercial and technical drivers underpinning our clients’ industries, as this enables us to quickly and efficiently advise on complex and technical matters affecting their businesses.
Get in touch with our top tier commercial litigation lawyers in Perth or Geraldon to see how we can assist you.
LLB, B.Com (Acc & Fin) (Hons) MAICD
Damian is a Director and Principal of Williams + Hughes. He has practiced as a lawyer for over 28 years in the commercial, resources, agribusiness, software and technology fields. He has managed many large deals, including major investments, farm-ins and JV’s, asset and share sale deals, capital raising transactions and construction matters.
Damian acts for a wide range of clients, including ASX and TSX listed companies, large private family groups and small to medium enterprises. Damian has special expertise in M&A transactions.
Damian adopts a pragmatic approach with a strong focus on ensuring his advice adds value and allows clients to get deals done.
Damian has significant business experience outside of law. This experience helps ensure he does not waste time on legal points that are not commercially important. His past and current roles include:
Damian is a current member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors, Energy and Resources Law and the Law Society of Western Australia.
Damian is based in our West Perth office. He is a regular legal CPD seminar presenter for the Law Society of Western Australia and Legalwise, where he has presented extensively on M&A topics. He is married with three children and enjoys making TV shows, travelling and playing indoor cricket.
Some of the significant matters Damian has advised on include:
Mining, resources and mining services
Mergers & Aquisitions
Pipelines, Tanks and Terminals
Construction
Software and IT related